Archive for the 'bioscience' Category

Call for Papers: Epidemic Orders

By: Carlo Caduff
Posted in avian flu, biopolitics, bioscience, catastrophe models, conferences and talks, early warning systems, emergency response, preparedness, risk, security frameworks, swine flu, vital systems on December 15th, 2009

CALL FOR PAPERS

Behemoth – A peer-reviewed journal published by the Akademie Verlag, Berlin

Special Issue: Epidemic Orders

In the past few years, epidemic events, both actual and virtual, have made a spectacular comeback. Emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases such as avian and swine flu have generated great anxiety the world over, resulting in a pervasive sense of vulnerability, insecurity, and uncertainty. A powerful spirit of urgency, based on a genuine concern for human health and well-being, overdetermined by a variety of scientific, political, and economic interests, engendered a real flurry of action. In the epic battle against germs, the biopolitical state mobilized material and symbolic resources at an unprecedented scale.

In the shadow of the emerging infectious disease threat, significant shifts in public health, medical care, and scientific research have occurred. The aim of this special issue of Behemoth is to offer an initial set of diagnostic accounts. What are the domains in which fundamental shifts have occurred over the past few years? Who are the actors involved and what are the underlying logics animating these shifts in public health, medical care, and scientific research? The key aim of this issue is to draw analytic attention to recent reconfigurations and to identify the kind of epidemic orders that are taking shape today at the heart of the biopolitical state.

Please send abstracts for this special issue of Behemoth to the editor Carlo Caduff (carlocaduff@access.uzh.ch) and to Kathrin Franke (behemoth@rz.uni-leipzig.de). Deadline for submission of abstracts: 30 January 2010. Deadline for submission of articles: 30 June 2010.

The End of Pandemic Severity

By: Carlo Caduff
Posted in avian flu, biopolitics, bioscience, risk, swine flu on May 14th, 2009

A World Health Organization official today signaled that the agency is stepping back from plans to develop a way to grade pandemic severity, because its experts believe severity will vary from place to place, making the development of a severity index difficult and its use impractical.

New Study on Swine Flu

By: Carlo Caduff
Posted in avian flu, biopolitics, bioscience, swine flu on May 13th, 2009

A new study on the swine flu virus by Neil Ferguson and his colleagues, published in Science, has shown that transmissibility of the swine flu virus is substantially higher than seasonal flu and comparable with lower estimates of R0 obtained from previous pandemics. The reproduction number (Ro), defined as the number of cases one case generates on average, is a key measure of transmissibility.

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/1176062

Cybernetics and China’s Population

By: Lyle Fearnley
Posted in bioscience, catastrophe models, information technology, vital systems on May 23rd, 2008

In her recent book Just One Child, anthropologist Susan Greenhalgh traces the origins of China’s infamous ‘one child policy’ to a group of defense scientists who specialized in cybernetics and ‘control theory’. Her book is unabashedly both an analytic project and a criticism of the roots of the policy, that is to say, she begins from the claim that the ‘one child policy’ is an ethical bad and uses her analysis to discover what led to such unethical policy. Her claim that missile scientists were at the route of the policy, in other words, is a denunciation of a particular application of ‘natural science’ in government policy. First, I will tell a little bit of her story, which is incredibly interesting in its resonances with some of the topics we have been following in VSS. Then, I want to show how the perspective we have developed in the VSS research collaboration can productively engage as well as put in perspective her denunciation of cybernetic planning.
Read the rest of this entry »

Vaccine Development Imbued With Politics!

By: Dale A. Rose
Posted in bioscience, preparedness on December 3rd, 2007

I shouldn’t be so snarky because the story is actually really interesting. Check out this link from yesterday’s LA Times, which details the behind-the-scenes politicking which proved the coup de grace for one of the nation’s first next-generation vaccines against a category A agent: VaxGen’s rPA102 anthrax vaccine. Deft lobbying and savvy rhetoric by Emergent BioSolutions, Inc., proved insurmountable for the South San Francisco company, which not only failed to produce the nation’s first BioShield-related vaccine, but was kicked in the teeth for trying. Amongst all the great reasons for not wanting to see anthrax ever appear amongst human populations in epidemic proportions is the discomfiting imagery of the six shot series of vaccinations that will still be needed in the event of such a threat. Emergent BioSolutions, manufacturer of said scary but mostly-kind-of effective vaccine, effectively argued that VaxGen’s (substantially less onerous) product was of questionable worth, developed by novices. Ouch. I thought BioShield’s point was to get novices in the game, because BigPharma was avoiding orphan vaccines like the plague. Ha! The plague!

Oh yeah, and look at this cool picture.

VaxGen's rPA102 vaccine vial

Introduction: Amelia Moore

By: Carlo Caduff
Posted in biopolitics, bioscience, introductions, risk, security frameworks, vital systems on December 3rd, 2007

I am happy to introduce Amelia Moore to this blog. Amelia is a doctoral student at UC Berkeley. Currently, she is conducting fieldwork in the Bahamas (and the U.S.). Her terrific research project focuses on biocomplexity and resonates with many other projects conducted by our little group over here at the vss blog. Amelia recently sent me a short description of her research project. To learn more, read on! Read the rest of this entry »

Wasted Public Funds

By: Carlo Caduff
Posted in biopolitics, bioscience, preparedness on November 3rd, 2007

Here is the GAO report on the US government’s ill-conceived attempt to fund the development of a second-generation vaccine for anthrax.

Labs linked to foot-and-mouth outbreak?

By: Lyle Fearnley
Posted in bioscience, food safety on August 9th, 2007

Though this isn’t confirmed yet, it might be an interesting biosecurity story to follow. From NYTimes, “An investigation, ordered by Prime Minister Gordon Brown, on Tuesday concluded that the spread of foot-and-mouth disease among livestock at two farms in southern England was probably caused by human movement from nearby laboratory facilities that was either “accidental or deliberate.””
One key debate in Britain is whether to vaccinate all livestock. The issue is that once a nation’s livestock is vaccinated, there can be non-symptomatic carriers of disease. This then poses a threat to other national herds when animals or animal products are traded. Thus, if Britain goes ahead with vaccination, “it would immediately lose its designation as a country free of foot-and-mouth disease.” Article below.
Read the rest of this entry »

CDC Suspends Work at Texas A&M Biodefense Lab

By: Carlo Caduff
Posted in bioscience, risk on July 4th, 2007

CDC suspended on Saturday all work at Texas A&M biodefense lab due to the failure to report a series of incidents.

Climate Change Futures

By: Carlo Caduff
Posted in biopolitics, bioscience, floods and hurricanes, food safety, insurance, preparedness, risk, security frameworks on July 4th, 2007

Melinda Cooper recently drew my attention to an interesting study conducted by Harvard Medical School Center and sponsored by Swiss Re and the United Nations Development Programme. The study predicts that “climate change will significantly affect the health of humans and ecosystems and these impacts will have economic consequences.” In addition, the study attempts to “survey” existing and future costs of climate change. It argues that the insurance industry “will be at the center of this issue, absorbing risk and helping society and business to adapt and reduce new risks.”

Read the rest of this entry »