<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Order Acomplia Without Prescription - Online DrugStore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anthropos-lab.net/bpc/2007/02/a-290-lecture-worth-the-catering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anthropos-lab.net/bpc/2007/02/a-290-lecture-worth-the-catering/</link>
	<description>An ARC blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:46:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Order Acomplia Without Prescription - Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://anthropos-lab.net/bpc/2007/02/a-290-lecture-worth-the-catering/comment-page-1/#comment-44170</link>
		<dc:creator>karpiak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropos-lab.net/bpc/2007/02/a-290-lecture-worth-the-catering/#comment-44170</guid>
		<description>... And although we want to be careful with some of the &quot;just-so&quot; tales anthropology likes to tell itself (and unsuspecting college freshmen), this does suggest to me that we should go back and re-think Malinowski&#039;s intervention in anthropological methodology.  Not necessarily in the olf-fashioned way (&quot;seperate yourself off from the white man...&quot;), but by asking questions like: in what way is &quot;being there&quot; important for the production of anthropological knowledge--in what ways are bodies, even their physical proximity, essential, etc.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; And although we want to be careful with some of the &#8220;just-so&#8221; tales anthropology likes to tell itself (and unsuspecting college freshmen), this does suggest to me that we should go back and re-think Malinowski&#8217;s intervention in anthropological methodology.  Not necessarily in the olf-fashioned way (&#8220;seperate yourself off from the white man&#8230;&#8221;), but by asking questions like: in what way is &#8220;being there&#8221; important for the production of anthropological knowledge&#8211;in what ways are bodies, even their physical proximity, essential, etc.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Acomplia Without Prescription - Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://anthropos-lab.net/bpc/2007/02/a-290-lecture-worth-the-catering/comment-page-1/#comment-44169</link>
		<dc:creator>karpiak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropos-lab.net/bpc/2007/02/a-290-lecture-worth-the-catering/#comment-44169</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that, in fact, some anthropologists have made their career based on other people&#039;s field notes.  Dorothy Lee, for example, wrote about &quot;non-linear thought&quot; among the Trobriand Islanders and actually critiques Malinowski using only his own notes.

Then, of course, there were the proverbial &quot;armchair anthropologists&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that, in fact, some anthropologists have made their career based on other people&#8217;s field notes.  Dorothy Lee, for example, wrote about &#8220;non-linear thought&#8221; among the Trobriand Islanders and actually critiques Malinowski using only his own notes.</p>
<p>Then, of course, there were the proverbial &#8220;armchair anthropologists&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

